Journalism: A Recap

26 Apr

A personal recap, at least. Coming off more than three years building and marketing data-driven news technology at Inform.com, it was a great pleasure to delve into reporting at Annenberg in Fall 2009.

I honed my undergraduate journalism experience by reporting extensively for Neon Tommy, writing feature pieces on changes happening at alt-weekly institution LA Weekly, charter schools, Web technology and local trials. It was an eclectic mix, to say the least.

During the second semester of my first year, I began gearing up to spend the summer reporting in Cape Town, South Africa. Our class analyzed plenty of news/blog content coming out of the young democracy, and I created a blog on Posterous where we could share our thoughts while in Africa. I also worked on several Web videos as an intern at News24.com, the country’s Web-only news organization.

In Cape Town I met the founder of tech/media site Memeburn.com and signed on as their Silicon Valley correspondent. I continue to write and edit for Neon Tommy, and have also signed on as a Web editor at Truthdig.com and a freelancer at Nabewise.com.

Coachella, Behind The Scenes

29 Apr

Each year Indio’s Empire Polo Grounds, one of the most beautiful venues in the country, becomes a launching pad where the world’s most able artists create transcendent experiences for tens of thousands of people – or not.

CLICK FOR SLIDESHOW:

Coachella SS 042

Coachella 2010, rocking from the heart of the Southern California desert and its 90-degree heat this weekend, was full of luxuriously crafted experiences.  It was also host to a few spectacular failures.

Jay-Z played the hip-hop don as Friday night’s headliner, pushing deep into his catalog despite an ailing throat. He invited his queen Beyonce onstage for a duet of Forever Young for the set’s emotional climax. The following afternoon, the two were spotted enjoying Beach House.  Hova needed to remind hundreds of oglers to take their eyes off of him and return them to Victoria Legrand.

Supergroups Them Crooked Vultures and Street Sweeper Social Club conjured blazing sets of veteran musicianship Friday, appealing to the crowd’s desire to revel in unapologetically boisterous anthems.

Georgia prog-metal band Baroness desecrated the land with finely tuned salvos of wailing warfare.

Tiesto spun an enchanted set Saturday night, sending warm streams of synth and tricked-out beats into the night air as an elaborate light show played on the purple mountains ringing the polo fields.

Beth Ditto brought her A-game in a soulful, completely swarmed Gossip performance in one of the tents Saturday afternoon.

Dirty Projectors delivered their African polyrhythms and playful, orchestrated harmonies soon afterward, delighting their swath of faithful fans.

Not every performance took full advantage of the auspicious occasion.  The festival’s biggest disappointment – by a landslide – was MGMT.  The Brooklyn indie pop stars did not appear to care for the crowd or for any of the songs they performed.  With the exception of a well-improvised version of Weekend Wars, the set was flat.  Their new songs, written for the band’s sophomore album Congratulations, failed.   Front man Andrew VanWyngarden’s stage banter was melancholic and he sounded preoccupied with the other performers he had apparently been meeting.

As a final insult to injury, MGMT declined to play one of their biggest hits, Kids, despite fervent encore chants at the close of the performance.  Grumbles rolled through the densely packed crowd as it shuffled away, miffed at having patiently waited through the less compelling newer songs for no payoff.  If the band has decided they are tired of being famous, as has been reported, the band’s Coachella presence confirmed that kind of petulant exhaustion.

Another missed connection came courtesy of Spoon, whose strutting neo-disco tunes suffocated somewhat in the ether.  Their performance was sparsely attended Sunday night considering their critical success, as the group competed against Phoenix and Miike Stone on other stages.

Perhaps the most complete failure of the weekend belonged to Sly Stone, who missed his scheduled slot Sunday evening, then showed up to a rescheduled set 40 minutes late in a ragtag costume and unstable state of mind.  Stone rambled to the audience, endured technical problems, stumbled through classic Sly and the Family Stone hits like Stand and Family Affair, then fled the stage.

Stepping over a few sad examples of wasted potential, Coachella muscled through an ambitious three-day showcase, confidently displaying the glory of a great American music festival: sweat, dust, dancing, drinking, and all.

Audio Slideshow: Long Beach Roller Derby

9 Apr

The result of almost a year of intensive planning, the new Long Beach Roller Derby league officially kicked off in April.  The league’s first match pitted the Terminal Island Tootsies against the 4th Street Retro Rollers in a sold-out contest

WATCH THIS AUDIO SLIDESHOW to get an idea of the preparation that was required to get the women ready for game time:

Roller Derby 022

LA Cyclists Go To Battle Over Hit And Runs

24 Feb

The Los Angeles bike community’s contentious relationship with the LAPD has found a positive stride – but there’s still a long way to go.

Representatives of several bike advocacy groups have begun monthly meetings with LAPD leaders including Commander David Doan and Sergeant David Krumer, part of a revolving LAPD/Cyclist Working Group intended to bring different interests to a common table.

The stronger relationship appears to be the result of new Chief of Police Charlie Beck’s promise to reach out to the cycling community.  In fact, Beck appeared at a special session of the City Council Transportation Committee on Wednesday to discuss hit and run accidents, among other topics.  [SLIDESHOW]

After the group’s initial meeting, activist Enci Box wrote that LAPD representatives ”were open to our concerns, they did their homework and they were very knowledgeable. They are aware of the issues on the streets and they seem to want to support our rights on the streets of LA.”

This is a major change for a diverse group that has often felt caught between angry motorists and unsympathetic law enforcement.  Stephen Box, husband of Enci and co-founder of the Bike Writers Collective, said the public’s comments on news sites demonstrate the true colors of the situation.

“When you hear this rage, that’s good.  We need people to hear and see.  This is what we hear every day, but nobody’s around to witness it.   So when they put it on [LATimes.com] in the comments section, ‘Thank you very much,’” Box said. “Because I didn’t have to hear it on the street and wonder if anybody else was a witness.”

Officer Shannon Enox, who has been working on the LAPD’s bicycle community outreach program for the past six months, confirmed Box’s concerns.

“It’s not made up,” Enox said. “People are yelling at [cyclists], honking their horns.”


View Larger Map

Clashes like the one instigated by Dr. Christopher Thompson in 2008 have become touchstones in the debate over the balance of cyclists’ and motorists’ rights.  Thompson quickly slammed on his brakes in front of two cyclists on a Brentwood road in July 2008, injuring both riders.  During Thompson’s trial, a police officer testified that the doctor admitted he slammed on his brakes in order to “teach them a lesson.”

Krumer was careful to draw the line between motorists’ words and deeds, explaining that most incidents involving bikers and drivers are accidents rather than crimes.

“There is a misunderstanding about what police can actually do,” Krumer said.  “It becomes difficult to police words.”

Krumer, working with Doan, released data analysis earlier this month indicating that 23 percent of bike-related collisions are hit-and-runs.  The bike community welcomed his gesture, in particular because hit-and-runs are one of the touchiest issues for cyclists.

However, Krumer said, hit-and-runs account for 38 percent of all vehicle-to-vehicle collisions, indicating that drivers are more likely to stop if they make contact with a bicyclist.

“Hit-and-runs are tough,” Krumer said.  “To actually prevent a hit-and run, I don’t know if that’s going to be within our reach.  We’re not clairvoyant.”

Other concerns raised by bike advocates at the LAPD meeting included access to major thoroughfares, perceived harassment by officers, and an array of safety concerns.  The aggregate of the conversation will affect policy but will not directly shape the city’s Bike Plan, which the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and the City Planning Commission have been developing for nearly two years.

“Our role is not to establish what the Plan is, but how it’s going to affect the community,” Enox said.

Stephen Box, working with Thompson, his wife, and others, has put together an alternative proposal, the Backbone Bikeway Network.  The Backbone is a holistic concept he sees as a more viable and more affordable alternative to the city’s draft Bike Plan.

“If law enforcement money is being spent, the focus should be on the Backbone,” Box said.

Box’s plan focuses on improving navigability and maintenance standards for the city’s major thoroughfares, so that serious riders can traverse the city safely and efficiently.   Box said that committing to the concept “costs nothing” and implementation would cost a fraction of the city’s proposed Bike Plan.

“I’ll be cooperating with the motorists and the bus operators because I won’t be so busy dodging potholes,” Box said.

Enci Box said one of her criticisms of the city’s Bike Plan, unveiled last year to activist outcry, is an emphasis on bike paths removed from major roads.

“We need to think about people in a larger issue within the city using our streets,” Box said. “Not recreational, segregating paths which I’m absolutely against.  As a woman and if I were to have children they would never get on a bike path because they’re segregated.

Another issue that the LAPD group will address is an anti-harassment ordinance aimed at motorists who disturb cyclists, set in motion last year by City Councilman Bill Rosendahl. A motion to study the creation of such an ordinance was approved by the city council Jan. 27.

Krumer said he opposes the idea, which he sees as largely unenforceable and important only “symbolically.”  He said he agrees with several of the ideas on the table, including better education for officers, drivers, and cyclists.
F6fae880-2265-11df-a709-000255111976 Blog_this_caption
“Our officers are not trained as well as they should be about bicycle-specific citations,” he said.

With many different interests at the table, patience will be the virtue over the following months.

“As time drags out, it will be clear that a lot of these changes are going to be time consuming,” Krumer said.  “It’s like trying to turn around a freight train.”

A Clip of History

18 Feb

Martin Luther King’s “I Have A Dream” speech never fails to stop me dead in my tracks.  The first time I heard it was probably elementary school.  It awed me then as it does today.

King draws on religious allegory to universalize the civil rights struggle, and in doing so creates something that will renew itself as the world changes.  He puts his finger firmly on the problem: the group once called Negroes had put so much of themselves into America and had received very little in return.  At least, they had received little that was not tainted with hatred and abuse.

The speech, however, describes King’s refusal to give up on America.  He speaks to the possibilities if the right action is taken.  He speaks of hope.  He warns those who would stand in the way of equality.  He talks about a common destiny for all Americans.

Speeches like this one give us reason to work for a greater good.  Without people like King, it would be easy to write this country off.  For me, a belief in a basic human decency drives my desire to do the work of journalism.  If people cannot change and if things cannot get better for those who suffer, then there is no point of writing/filming/talking about any of it.  I believe that there is a point, and King was one of the first leaders to show that to me.

Thank you, Dr. King.

A Conversation with Stephen Box

18 Feb

Here’s a part of a conversation with LA bike activist Stephen Box last Friday at City Hall.  We talked about the state of cycling in the city and his vision for safe bike transportation, the Backbone Bikeway Network.

Toward Expertise

4 Feb

As a new semester begins at USC Annenberg, the forces of the universe have aligned such that I can contribute to this blog as part of a class.  So, it’s going back online.

My focus here has been a treatment of forces that shape Web journalism, whether we choose to acknowledge these forces or not.  They include a push toward cheap reporting labor, social media platforms as delivery vehicles for content, and the persistent tendency of journalists to ignore the business side of media.

Many pundit bloggers exist to practice metajournalism.  I am a journalist first, documenting the trade as I see it, and the technology that makes our would-be bosses nervous and vulnerable.  As I work toward an expertise in survival-mode journalism, I will also document the pockets of opportunity (and warn of potential dangers) as I find them.

This blog is for my peers and for myself.  Here’s to our success. We’ll see you on the Web.

On Volunteers

12 Sep

I typed most of this post on an iPhone aboard a Virgin America flight (LAX>JFK) waiting out an air traffic control delay.

Such is my life these days, and I am glad about it. After a few weeks at Neon Tommy, I’m thinking about what it means to volunteer. Particularly in the context of “Free,” a popular and sometimes controversial Web media strategy (also title of a treatise by Wired’s Chris Anderson).

The basic idea is that somet303_CIA-Army-Guatemalaimes it’s more profitable in the long run to give something away than it is to charge for it.

Though Free can’t last forever. If you’re YouTube, you provide a free video service and sell it to Google when your user base is massive (a rare exception). If you’re Gillette, which Anderson references, you give away the handles and sell the blades at a premium. But if you’re a news Web site, then what?

Well, you’re probably looking for volunteers. These are people who will work for little or nothing, sometimes citizen journalists, sometimes interns, sometimes guest columnists, sometimes students.

Volunteers, in their ideal form, combine a passion for the work with motivating self-interest.  Makes sense, right?  Have some fun, learn some things, and get into better position for the future. In the meantime, you may be paying the bills doing something else too.

My Web site has the good fortune to attract journalism and PR students from USC, many of whom see Neon Tommy (a part-time gig) as part of their path to a decent paycheck after graduation. I want that for them too. But as I said, Free doesn’t last forever. People move on.

Professional news sites who don’t charge for content may never be able to do so. But, if the news is going to be free, more of the labor must be free too.

The huge caveat: when you’re working for free, you can’t be expected to work like you’re getting paid.  Thus, professional organizations will be wise to grow a force that is willing to work on a volunteer basis, but who will likely want to work from wherever’s convenient and who will have lots of other things going on in their lives.  Professional organization, partially deprofessionalized workforce.

In this scenario, people move in and out of the equation, submitting and editing content remotely and sharing their allegiance with many groups.  A news site will employ a team of editors on one side and ad/event salespeople on the other.  This way, the institution can continue to grow, generate revenue, and eventually hire some of the volunteers.

Maybe this isn’t Utopia.  But it does sound like part of the likely model for sustaining Web-only news businesses on the Web.

Tags: , ,

The Danger of Learning Journalism but not the Media Business

28 Aug

Yet at the moment when legacy media are being excoriated for their demonstrable failure to adapt quickly to the new world of digital convergence, and when newspapers are dying daily, the performance and responsibilities of the institutions that train so many journalists, editors and managers has gone largely unexamined in the public eye.

-Ernest Wilson, Dean of USC’s Annenberg School for Communication [emphasis mine]

It has been a good week for the Annenberg School and for those of us who decided to pursue studies here.  And after a summer of nervous musing and geezers hating on journalism school, it’s heartening to be in a place whose Web-oriented curriculum leads the pack, urging and empowering students to take charge of their professional destinies.

As such, the school’s leadership is not shy about pointing the spotlight directly onto journalism schools.  In a way, Annenberg is calling other j-schools out (though too diplomatic to say so).  Wilson’s piece on Poynter.org, the Web home of journalism industry scribe Jim Romenesko, explicitly places a share of responsibility for the decline of mainstream news upon the shoulders of j-schools.

Wilson speaks of the Academy acting as “rather passive observers”  promoting “shocking economic illiteracy” that leads graduates into making “ill-informed career choices.”  He’s right. During the past few years in particular, we have watched thousands of experienced journalists broken down and ground up like livestock passing through the slaughterhouse.

By Wilson’s stats, half of those folks attended journalism school. And a whole lot more grads are on the way.

Many of those forced out of their positions were taught to live by the code of church (editorial side) and state (business side), as distinct entities working toward different ends.  When the going gets rough, though, the state’s economic interests trump those of the church.  Though it is worth asking: is it worth creating news if nobody’s buying it?

Today’s working journalists increasingly are those jack-of-all-trades types who either grew up on the Web, or figured out mid-career that digital skills were the only path to job stability.  Programs like Annenberg, CUNY (which offers a graduate degree only), and NYU are certainly training their students that way.

However, digital skills must go hand in hand with business sense.  Thought leader and media industry strategist Paul Conley reported the following last year after touring a number of journalism programs around the country:

[M]any journalism students are woefully unprepared to enter our business. Too many of them are preparing for careers that just won’t exist in the near future. These students are naive. They seem to have little interest in studying the industry they are about to enter. They don’t read the trade press. They don’t follow the debates about the future of journalism. They seem unaware of the tremendous difficulties faced by most traditional publishers. Because they don’t follow developments in the business, they have no idea of what the business wants from them.

There you have it.  And without a really canny sense of where the news business is now and where it will be, as well as a fluency in the language of media organizations’ business operators, j-school students will be doing little more than getting ready to play the role of disempowered livestock.  As journalism schools examine themselves and rework their curricula, Annenberg included, topics like entrepreneurship, competitive strategy, content marketing, and personal branding must be at the top of the list.

Tags: , ,

On Not Having a Business Model

22 Aug

We don’t have a business model, but we have a business.

-Robert Hernandez, former Director of Development, Seattle Times, Current USC professor

In a rallying speech earlier this week to incoming Annenberg grad students, new professor Hernandez spoke  about the central role that a well-integrated, road-ready organization can play in the Reinvention of Journalism.   I think he’s absolutely right, but I’d like to take off from his statement for a rallying cry of my own.

My take: We do indeed have a business, which is journalism.  And we also, in fact, have a business model.  Actually, we have many business models.  They just happen to be in flux, sometimes overlapping and sometimes competing, some failibigbangng and some succeeding marvelously.

Journalism is testing Freemium.  It is testing Micropayments.  And Network Effects.  Of course many newspapers and magazines are still rocking Bricks and Clicks.  Newspapers have and will continue to enjoy Subsidization. Still plenty of  Ad and/or Subscription-based businesses too.   Lots and lots of testing, and plenty of failure!

And this is absolutely the right situation for us to be in.  After all, what do you expect when an entire industry is forced to reexamine itself so thoroughly that it births a pantheon of new media criticism while trying not to mourn the pink-slipped as recently deceased men and women?

What we have as a result is a movement for change, an embrace of entrepreneurship, short-term instability and constant experimentation.  We have also a born-of-necessity infrastructure for measuring, sharing, and duplicating success (including Publish2, Twitter, and the larger blogosphere). There will at the same time continue to be bankruptcies, downsizing, and closings of different properties, real and virtual.  Let us hope, however, that the era of slow decay is coming to a close.

Because my career began at a Web start-up, I tend to see the good in the mess of experimentation, from small success to big failure, and even feel affinity for the large tech players (including Google) as they redefine the landscape (despite the fact they are often brutal to the smaller players).  In the world of Web technology start-ups, some sharp and original functionality, combined with a perceived likelihood of achieving critical mass, can earn a new venture some capital.

This may be a few hundred thousand dollars or several million dollars.  This money may last only a year and may lead to company growth, which brings more funding.  But usually, the venture ends in failure.  Lessons are learned and those involved move to another company, another project.  I think this is a great way for things to work!

For young professionals who enter graduate journalism school as a next step in their respective career paths, a two-year haven to figure things out and accrue additional debt, or both, there are no guarantees.  However many of us grew up in a world that did not offer any guarantees to begin with.

In my family, if you wanted to do something, you needed to find the money.  Tuition for my siblings and me came from loans, family friends, my grandmother, parents’ wages, scholarships if we were good and lucky, and anywhere else we could come up with the scratch.  Entrepreneurship works the exact same way.

All of us must be on the lookout for those who will invest in us and our futures, whether that is “friends and family,” venture capital, or the public we serve.  Things will often be dicey. One common monolithic business model may never come to pass. We may be relatively poor.  We may also, on the first or the third or the tenth try, find something we can personally help build into another great pillar of journalism. And it may indeed be profitable. Let it be so.

Tags: , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.